PLOS Currents Author Guide
PLOS Currents: Disasters will consider any content relevant to disasters—natural or manmade, local, regional or global. Possible topics include: description of disasters; effects of disasters on the environment or on human populations; immediate management of disasters, both environmental and clinical; disaster risk management; disaster risk reduction; follow up of disasters, short and long term; implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015. The submissions do not have to be full-length articles and emphasis should be placed on the results and data, rather than on the potential impacts. The commenting feature in Google Knol is useful for discussions about the interpretations and significance of the findings.
General Guidelines
Submission of a manuscript to PLOS Currents: Disasters implies that all listed authors contributed substantially to the work, and that the work is an original contribution.
In cases when it is not immediately clear whether a contributor should be an author or simply acknowledged, please follow the policies used by the PLOS Journals.
If a manuscript constitutes primary publication of results from a study involving human subjects, authors must affirm that it was done in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
In general, for studies involving human or animal research, authors should follow the policies established for the PLOS Journals (see for example the relevant policies in PLOS Medicine).
Authors may use any common citation style (e.g., AMA style, APA style, the Chicago Manual of Style, etc.) in the Reference section, as long as it is used consistently and authorship of cited works is adequately attributed, with all information necessary to locate cited material included.
Instructions for Writing and Submitting Knols to PLOS Currents
Once you have created a PLOS Currents account and logged in, you will be able to create a new article via the WordPress Dashboard, which is accessible from the top of any PLOS Currents page. Before creating a new submission, please make sure of the following:
A) Please ensure that you are logged in to the correct PLOS Currents section – the name of the section will appear in the Dashboard bar at the top of the page. Unfortunately, we are not able to transfer articles between PLOS Currents sections at the moment.
B) Please ensure that you are creating a new Article, rather than a new ‘Post.’ Posts cannot be published in PLOS Currents, and will need to be re-submitted as articles.
From the Annotum Dashboard page, select the ‘Articles’ button on the left-hand sidebar, followed by the ‘Add New’ button.
Enter the paper’s Title, Abstract, Funding Statement, and Acknowledgments into the appropriate text fields on the submission page.
Inviting co-authors
A) If your co-authors have not already created PLOS Currents profiles, invite them to do so via the ‘invite a new user’ link, found in the ‘Co-Authors’ box on the right-hand sidebar.
B) If your co-authors already have Annotum profiles, enter their names into the search field in the ‘Co-Authors’ box on the right-hand sidebar, select the correct name, and click the ‘Add’ button.
Important – the order in which you add authors will be the order in which they appear in the author list.
Creating Article Text
A) Note the tags found in the ‘Body’ text field – these tags will allow you to correctly format your article for publication. B) Section headings (Introduction, Methods, Results, etc) should be provided in the text fields ( = paragraph). Sub-headings should be denoted by using bold text formatting. C) New sections can be created by pressing Ctrl + Enter on your keyboard while within a section. will create a new section. . field will create a new . Additional Information Creating References in Annotum Creating Equations in Annotum Inserting Figures in Annotum Creating Tables in Annotum Editiorial Process Editorial Statuses Once editing is complete, authors submit their article for review. The submission process is a single click: Different users (authors, editors, etc) see a different view of the article status pane depending on their permission level: Once the article is submitted, Annotum then optionally notifies the editor (if email notification is disabled, the editor may simply monitor the article queue for new submissions), and the editor assigns one or more reviewers to the task. Next, reviewers sign in, read the article, and enter comments if desired. Reviewers have a separate, private comment area as well, one not visible to Authors. Optionally, site administrators can enable a form of open-process review in which review comments (and the identity of each reviewer) is visible to the authors. After the reviewer enters any relevant comments, which might be a question back to the editor (in effect the lead reviewer), he or she makes a recommendation: Approve, Reject, or Request Revisions. When all the reviews are submitted (or whatever portion is sufficient according to the editorial policy of the publication) the editor makes a final ruling on the article, which again can be Approve, Reject, or Request Revisions Once approved, the article is ready for final copyediting and publishing by a site admin (editors cannot publish); if revisions are requested the article returns to a draft status for further editing by the author(s). And if the article is rejected it is removed from the publication queue. In all cases notification is sent to the authors and editors of the final decision. The publication staff (admins) makes whatever final tweaks are required, and publishes the articles live on the public-facing web site.
Submitting Articles
.Submitted: author view
Assigning Reviewers
Review process
Reviewer comments
Reviewer comments
Approval
Approved