PLOS Currents Disasters

  • Log in
  • Home
  • Aims & Scope
  • Review Board
    • Reviewer Guide
  • Authors ↓
    • Author Guide
    • Figure Creation
    • Table Creation
    • Equation Creation
    • Reference Creation
    • PLOS Currents FAQ
  • Resources
  • About
    • Guidelines for Comments

Disasters at Mass Gatherings: Lessons from History

January 31, 2012 · Research Article

Introduction: Reviews of mass gathering events have traditionally concentrated on crowd variables that affect the level and type of medical care needed. Crowd disasters at mass gathering events have not been fully researched and this review examines these aiming to provide future suggestions for event organisers, medical resource planners, and emergency services, including local hospital emergency departments.

Methods: A review was conducted using computerised data bases: MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, HMIC and EMBASE, with Google used to widen the search beyond peer-reviewed publications, to identify grey literature. All peer-review literature articles found containing information pertaining to lessons identified from mass gathering crowd disasters were analysed and reviewed. Disasters occurring in extreme weather events, and environmental leading to participant illness were not included. These articles were read, analysed, abstracted and summarised.

Results: 156 articles from literature search were found detailing mass gathering disasters identified from 1971 – 2011. With only 21 cases found within peer-review literature. Twelve events were further documented as a case reports. Five events were examined as review articles while four events underwent commissioned inquiries. Analysis of cases were categorised in to crowd control, event access, fire safety, medical preparedness and emergency response.

Conclusions: Mass gathering events have an enormous potential to place a severe strain on the local health care system, and a mixture of high crowd density, restricted points of access, poor fire safety, minimum crowd control and lack of on-site medical care can lead to problems that end in disaster.

Evidence for disaster risk reduction, planning and response: design of the Evidence Aid survey

October 14, 2011 · Research Article

Systematic reviews are now regarded as a key component of the decision making process in health care, and, increasingly, in other areas. This should also be true in disaster risk reduction, planning and response. Since the Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004, The Cochrane Collaboration and others have been working together to strengthen the use and usefulness of systematic reviews in this field, through Evidence Aid. Evidence Aid is conducting a survey to identify the attitudes of those involved in the humanitarian response to natural disasters and other crises towards systematic reviews and research in such settings; their priorities for evidence, and their preferences for how the information should be made accessible. This article contains an outline of the survey instrument, which is available in full from www.EvidenceAid.org. The preliminary findings of the survey will be published in future articles.

« Newer

Call for Submissions

Announcing Outbreaks

newsletter signup

Sign Up for the PLOS Currents: Disasters Newsletter



Twitter

Tweets about "#plosc_disasters OR @plosc_disasters OR \"PLOS Currents Disasters"\ OR \"PLOSCurrentsDisasters\" OR currents.plos.org/disasters lang:en"

Disasters Blog

  • Home
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • About
  • Contact